View Message

Naming one baby is enough to make many people go somewhat crazy. Naming two is more than twice as bad, and conjoined twins ... I read somewhere about conjoined girls who did not survive: can't remember when or even where, but they were named Mary Ellen and Marie Helen.

---

If these two survive, what are the odds they'll become known as Leigh and Lyn? Just for convenience?

---

And if it were me, and I really needed to have matchy names, I'd aim for meanings: Helen and Lucy, or Anne and Grace though I dislike Grace so I wouldn't. But that would be the idea.

---

Peter and Simon would be a bit too obvious for boys.

Sad aberration of Paisley, which is plenty unique and underused as is.

Jesus. One of those is bad on their own, but together... I thought I had bad naming style. WOOEE.

---

I love the story. But the names are atrocious. 'Nuff said.

This message was edited 7/18/2017, 5:23 PM

An incredible story. It seems like with identical twins emphasizing what is disparate with very different names would be helpful given that people will incessantly confuse them anyway. I also prefer Paisley to Paisleigh by far.

Oh :/ I agree with Rachel Shaina. They are way too similar. I also dislike the spellings. I also think that people will want to shorten both of their names to Pais. At least all the Lindsays, Ashleys, Courtneys, Baileys etc. I know often get called Linds, Ash, Court and Bay. Pais and Pais :(

"You came out as one person and that's how you will remain".

Great story! Awful name choices.