Message: "Re: Warning: sedative possibly needed to read this :-p"

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Warning: sedative possibly needed to read this :-p

by Chrisell

4/2/2006, 4:35 AM

Yes it does - there's more of them down low on the list than up high, though. There's Natalie & Nathan at 20, Jada & Jaden at 57, Emily & Matthew at 85, Emma & Jacob at 86, Zachary & Zoe at 95 and Emily & Ethan at 99.

I guess that parents of b/g twins are less likely to hit on the *same* tacky combination as other parents!

♦ Chrisell ♦

All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Replies

- Miranda (Randee15) +1

4/2/2006, 5:01 AM

D'oh!

My twofold excuse: 1. it's 5:00 a.m. here, and I really should be asleep, and 2. the similarities temporarily blinded me!

*Jots Jada and Jaden on the personal favourites list*

Miranda
Image hosting by Photobucket

Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.

- Isla

4/2/2006, 9:39 AM

I know we're extra sensitive about "twinny" names (even you can even lump them all in that category) but you have to wonder WHAT people are thinking. We recently had b/g twins at work named Kayden and Kayla. And I thought that was bad enough. :-/

~Heather~

View Message

Replies