View Message

3 BAs
This year is busy for babies in my circle and we've had three already.Laurence is his mummy and daddy's 1st baby.Hallie May joins big brother, 3 year old Theo in Wales.and finally, Christopher, Derek, Natalie, Betty, Andrew and Chance (f) have their baby brother Wyatt.
Now we're waiting on my cousin's and my Uncle-in-law's first babies in the summer!http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/117870?sort=rank&pop=ew
^Top 2 = Alice and James ~~ Bottom 2 = Stark and Indiana (m)
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I like seeing Laurence used! It's so charming as a full name. I really dislike any nicknames for it though and it seems very serious to use all the time. I've been preferring Larkin for a boy over Laurence lately.Hallie May as a combo is a little to twee for my tastes. Is she going by Hallie May or Hallie? I don't hate Hallie as far as nicknames as full names go but I still don't like nicknames as full names generally. Harriet nn Hallie would be much better. And that sibset of 7 seems so mismatched! Christopher and Andrew are classic (if boring...and not my fave classic boys names anyway), Natalie is dated trendy to me, Derek is a name I really love and find handsome but is also very 50-60 year old man-ish, Betty as a full name is terrible and it's incredibly dated and not quite at the point of a comeback yet...and then you have Chance on a girl, for which I have no words...and now the super current and popular Wyatt? Totally weird.
vote up1
I adore Laurence.
vote up1
Hi !!!Laurence is super-classic. It is a little boring.Theo is ok. Hallie May..not my style.Wyatt seems a surname imo.Chrustopher and Derek are nice.Chance as female? Interesting but not my cup of tea.But congratulation for all these families!!!!
vote up1