View Message

Diane
Is it usable? Do you like it? "And by the way, dearie, your punctuation sucks canal water!"
-The Ghost of Vivian Vance
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

It's most definitely usable! But it's really dated.I prefer Diana.
vote up1
I like it in French (deeAN, said quickly) but not in English, especially in the UK where people tend to accent the first syllable so it sounds like Die, Anne!
It's usable, if a bit retro in English-speaking countries.
vote up1
It's dated, but not seriously so; it was never so popular that it got linked to a particular decade.That said, I don't like it. Diana flows better, and doesn't seem to attract the really whiney diYAN sound. But both have Di as their obvious nn, and it isn't the most cheerful monosyllable.
vote up1
I think Diana is more usable as a first name. I would totally use Diane as a middle name, especially if the first name ends with an a.
vote up1
I don't like it much, though I have to say I've always liked it more than Diana.It's usable.
vote up1
Well, it really looks a bit old fashioned, but I like this name anyway.Reminds me to Diane Heidkrüger, probably better known here as Diane Kruger, the lovely Diana Ross & Diana Frances, Princess of Wales-unforgotten Lady Di.
vote up1
usable but I don't like itxo
vote up1
Yes, it's dated.
vote up1
Of course it's usable! I don't like it much, but it's not hideous.
vote up1
I love it! It's so trim and pert.
vote up1
It's my mom's middle name, although she likes to spell it Dianne. It's dated, but it's still usable.
vote up1
Perhaps "usable" wasn't the right word. I should have asked if it was too dated.
vote up1
Not at all dated; Diane (Dianne / Diana - or any other version or spelling) bears history & heritage beyond two thousand-years; no popularity trend within one or two-hundred years bears sufficient merit to affect this legacy.

This message was edited 8/11/2016, 2:06 AM

vote up1
I'm not sure.That's the problem. It feels dated, but I could still see it being used. I've heard so many dated names on kids lately - Eileen, Hazel, Gloria - that I wouldn't blink if I heard Diane on a baby. And I'd rather see Diane than Hayleigh (which is also dated to me.) So there you go. I don't know if that helped at all!
vote up1
Hazel isn't dated. It's vintage. That's why it's regaining popularity. Though you've heard the others, they haven't moved into the vintage category yet.
vote up1
I was just gonna say haha a young mom on YouTube named her daughter Hazel, and she's cute as a button!
vote up1
Diane is lovely. I think these days Diana is more usable.
vote up1
Definitely usable.It's my middle name. My mother used to go on about how much she loved it, which is something she didn't do about my first name, nor the first names of my sisters, come to think about it. So I never understood why she made it my middle name and not my first name.I remember when a married couple I knew said that they liked it and were considering it for a daughter, and I was surprised because this was in the mid 1980s, when it had already become dated. That made me think that maybe there was something to it I wasn't quite appreciating.When my mom would say how much she loved it, I used to just shrug my shoulders and think, "Ew dated", but now I actually can separate it from its datedness and see the appeal.So all of this is a way of saying I LIKE IT. I LIKE IT.

This message was edited 8/10/2016, 8:15 AM

vote up1
I don't see why it wouldn't be usable. I personally find it boring and dated, along with Diana, which for me isn't exciting even with the Roman goddess and Wonderwoman to back it up.
vote up1
I recently met a little Diane. She was around 2.
vote up1
In a retro 70s/80s kind of way? I'd still say no....
vote up1
I much, much prefer Diana. Diane seems much more middle-aged and frumpy than Diana ever will. But Diane does make an attractive middle name.
vote up1
It is usable and although I don't dislike it I do prefer Diana. Diane just feels a bit unfinished.
vote up1