New Post
Search
HelpRe: dictionary def
in reply to a message by blaaaarg
That's fine! I never said she couldn't or shouldn't reply if she wanted to! I generally think she has useful opinions.... I've just read "ridiculous" as a reply on enough similar names that, for THOSE names I don't find the comments all that productive. I only mentioned it because I myself would like to know if I were wasting my time on someone/something that wasn't giving the time back. Obviously no one read it as the playful banter I intended it to be...
this board does a really great job of making me feel like a misunderstood mean girl :( :( I apologize if that's how I come off because it's never my intention. Apparently I'm not very good at communicating via the interwebs
this board does a really great job of making me feel like a misunderstood mean girl :( :( I apologize if that's how I come off because it's never my intention. Apparently I'm not very good at communicating via the interwebs
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Hah. Well, I find it's better if you put it in the original post. like "haters need not apply" or something. rather than a personal response
1
Haters gon hate... that's cool :) No, really I welcome negative comments as well, and frankly have seen some pretty hilariously insightful comments from Rox. I just thought she, of all people, could take a little heat for being less creative in these recurring remarks. Didn't go over so well I guess. Live and learn
1