View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

agree...
in reply to a message by Calla
But you know what? It's funny, if Primrose so perfectly embodies the stereotype of what girls were expected to be, how come it was never or almost never used back then?My theory is even back then people thought it was stupid.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Bahaha.I think maybe because it wasn't Biblical? Perhaps?But I don't know. Some families I'm surprised men didn't name their daughters Silence and Obedience.
vote up1
some did, apparently...Puritans had some pretty strange names for both male and female children. Fear, Difficulty, Remember, Deliverance, ("Squeal, Piggy!") Providence, Comfort, that kind of thing. But by and large, ordinary names like mary, Dorothy, John and George (two of which are not even Biblical) were much mor popular.
vote up1
Hmm, good point!
vote up1