Re: James for a girl
in reply to a message by Billina
I don't see the appeal of giving your daughter a traditionally masculine name, especially one that is so damn popular for boys. People scoff at me when I mention I like the names Sacha, Robin, Jules, etc. for boys. They also scoff at Remy, something that baffles me because Remy is a traditional masculine name in French. They tell me they'll "get teased for having a girl's name." Yet, these people name their daughters things like Ryan, Madison, Mackenzie, Morgan, Rene, Elliott, Aubrey, Ayden, Taylor, Rory, Blake, etc. Ultimately, I don't really care, and it doesn't really matter. I just wish they'd realize that if they give their daughter a masculine name to "give her more opportunities in life" and "grant her more respect in the workplace", they are sending a message: femininity is a bad thing. Femininity is less than masculinity.
James, however, is preferable to names like Kaylynn and Kayla, which are altogether meaningless.
James, however, is preferable to names like Kaylynn and Kayla, which are altogether meaningless.