Re: Are Roman names pretentious?
Haha, no, not in general. Some of the longer ones that are fashionable might be. Augustus, Octavia, Cecilia, Severus, Livia, Titus, Seneca, Valeria, Aurelia, Flavia, Drusilla, Cornelius ... they might be hipsterish, sure. But it's not because they are Roman. It might be because they sound so noticeably Roman, but names that are "fresh" and sound distinctly anything that refers to things learned in a book, can be hipsterish.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  turquoise  ·  6/25/2012, 6:43 PM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  Bear  ·  6/26/2012, 4:30 PM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  Lily  ·  6/26/2012, 1:38 PM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  Elena  ·  6/26/2012, 8:21 AM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  Billina  ·  6/26/2012, 7:56 AM
No -nt  ·  humblebee  ·  6/26/2012, 7:35 AM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  Kat  ·  6/26/2012, 5:56 AM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  jennifer  ·  6/26/2012, 5:27 AM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  AngieAngelique  ·  6/26/2012, 4:05 AM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  UniqueNameLover  ·  6/26/2012, 12:01 AM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  Apolline  ·  6/25/2012, 9:22 PM
This. nt  ·  Dita  ·  6/26/2012, 12:33 AM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  mirfak  ·  6/25/2012, 7:32 PM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  queenv  ·  6/25/2012, 7:42 PM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  Dita  ·  6/26/2012, 12:51 AM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  mirfak  ·  6/25/2012, 8:52 PM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  pinkamena  ·  6/25/2012, 8:33 PM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  ninjato  ·  6/25/2012, 7:15 PM
Re: Are Roman names pretentious?  ·  queenv  ·  6/25/2012, 6:55 PM
No and I agree with everything queenv said (nt)  ·  Bellamiasofia  ·  6/26/2012, 1:37 AM