View Message

Maple
Maple Sylvie Bateman was born.Actor Jason Bateman and his wife Amanda (Paul Anka's daughter) had another daughter. Their oldest is Francesca Nora.I think the name is pretty cute. I wonder if Amanda's was trying to honour her Canadaian roots with the name Maple.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

This makes me smile. My friend Mabel gets called this by little kids all the time and I think it's really sweet.
vote up1
There's something sweet about it, but the first time I saw Maple Sylvie, I had to do a double take because I thought it said "Maple Syrup." I also don't particularly like the way Maple Bateman sounds. But the name unto itself is charming.
vote up1
I like it. It's one of my favourite plant/nature names. It's also the name of a young woman in a poem by Robert Frost.
vote up1
why so many double postsaaaaa

This message was edited 2/17/2012, 1:15 PM

vote up1
I'm interested in Maple on and off. It's similar to Hazel, Mabel, etc. I could see it (slowly) getting more popular. It doesn't strike me as too out there, while still being interesting. I think the combo is great.
vote up1
It reminded me of the Robert Frost poem Maple, which I was fascinated by as a kid: http://famouspoetsandpoems.com/poets/robert_frost/poems/731It's not something I'd use, but there's many worse names.
vote up1
Well, there is the obvious syrup connection, but other than that it isn't a BAD name. It's okay.Francesca and Maple make a rather interesting sibset.
vote up1
Just read this and was about to post about the name, but you beat me to it! I think Maple is so cute! I love trees and leaves, so Maple just makes me think of pretty leaves.
vote up1
Uurgh. I don't like it. Maybe it's because I am Canadian? Maple is... syrup, butter, fudge, sugar candies, leaves, sap, trees, the Toronto Maple Leafs. So many things but not something I think should be used as a name. It's kind of like naming your child Oak or Pine.I think Francesca Nora makes it even worse because they're so mismatched.
vote up1
happy to see Maple! I love that name!!!
vote up1
I like Sylvie! But am I the only one who's finding it hard not to say Maple Syrup instead of Maple Sylvie? It's like my mouth says the words before I can stop them. Francesca Nora is lovely.
vote up1
Surprisingly cute, but Francesca and Maple are odd for sisters. Oh, well, I guess siblings only live together for a short time.
vote up1
I hope the name doesn't ever become poplar, I mean popular.
vote up1
*grin*
vote up1
Ha!:D
vote up1
I love the name Maple. It reminds me of the Robert Frost poem. I'm glad someone used it. I also really like Sylvie.

This message was edited 2/16/2012, 4:50 PM

vote up1
DangI've liked Maple for a long time. I think it's adorable. Darn celebrities going and using it. Not that I planned on using it myself, just sayin'. :P
vote up1
Apple, Coco, Maple...they're taking ALL the foods.
vote up1
Maple is adorable. I really like it! It's probably my new favorite nature name. And Maple Sylvie is a sweet combo. So lovely.
vote up1
Uaaaah cool. Maple is on my guilty pleasures list. Kind of surprised they picked it. Maybe they visit this board :P I don't like Sylvie and Francesca but Nora is nice.
vote up1
I like it! Francesca and Maple is a really mismatched sibset, though.
vote up1
Maybe. I don't really like Maple as a fn (I think of it as more of a surname or street name), but in the context, it's understandable and I suppose w/ a common surname like Bateman, it will conveniently stand out. On the other hand, the Jpns. name Kaede (rhymes w/ Friday) means maple and it's at least a "real name".
vote up1
Kaede would be pretty hard to pronounce for most Americans. I bet not a single person would pronounce it correctly at first. And Maple is a real name. Words can be names, many are common such as Faith, Autumn and Grace.
vote up1
Mmmmm... But Faith, Autumn and Grace are OFFICIALLY real names. Maple is not officially a real given name in the way they are any more than Spatula or Refrigerator are real names. Once saide, Kaede would be easy for westerners to pronounce... No harder than Phoebe which has become pretty standard.
vote up1
Um... according to the SSA data, the name Maple was used enough times in 1901 to show up in the top 1000 names. Autumn didn't even show up in the same data until the 1960s. Kaede has never featured in that data. So if you're going for "recognisably a name in the US", Maple definitely qualifies.
vote up1
Ok... It seems a little on the fringe side though... and how many people were required to be named that to get into the top 1000 back in 1901? Kaede has prob'ly become more standard in Japan in the past few decades... and I don't know if ANY Jpns. names have ever made the top 1000 in the States unless there are western names that match them in spelling and/or sound (like Ken, Mari, Marika, Marina, Erika, etc.). Wonder how many people shook their heads back then when Maple was used... It may be possible that with the large name base and larger population from which to make current top 1000 lists, there would be names that more people use now that wouldn't make it. Not sure what the numbers would be for that though. Whatever the case, I wouldn't want to walk around with that as a personal fn... though it would be fine as a surname.
vote up1
But in order to become an official real name you have to use a word as a name. You just have to start somewhere. And Autumn hasn't been used at all before the 60s. Also I don't think Kaede will ever become as well known as Phoebe so she'd have to explain it over and over for the rest of her life.
vote up1
I'd still rather explain it than walk around as Maple. People in mono-cultural settings could benefit from some expansion of awareness of other cultures anyway. Just because people grow up in a bubble with limited awareness of the world beyond them doesn't mean they have to stay in the unaware bubble... and my point was that those around the person w/ the name would get used to it quickly and it would be really easy to say, so it wouldn't be a problem... not like if I used a name with the Ry consonant cluster.
vote up1
Honestly, if I didn't know better, I'd think Kaede was a kinda feminine spelling of Cade. In an English speaking country, where my parents don't have any relation to Japan, I'd rather be Maple.

This message was edited 2/16/2012, 11:53 PM

vote up1
Well, that's up to you... Might depend what part of the country you're in too... and if you have anyone around you who reads manga... If you live in more multi-cultural areas or near the manga and anime fans, then it might not phase people so much. However, when you're with mono-lingual, mono-cultural folk, I suppose the other would be possible... I'd rather explain something I classed as a real name from another culture than something that just seemed like a random word though.
vote up1
In my area, we have plenty of people who read manga. But they're all about 13 years old. I used to read manga. Still wouldn't assume Kaede "rhymes with Friday", if I met an American child with the name. Like Amphelise said, Maple has been used enough in the US to make charts a few times. Kaede hasn't. Plus, Maple aligns with a few trends in the US (similar feel to Hazel, Mabel, which are coming back). Kaede doesn't. Honestly I don't even see how Maple and Kaede are comparable, except that they mean the same thing. Eve and Psyche both originate from their languages word for "to breathe". That doesn't mean they're automatically alternates for each other.

This message was edited 2/17/2012, 1:05 PM

vote up1
Well, if the purpose of choosing the name was its meaning and that MEANING's association with the person's heritage, then maple and Kaede have EVERYTHING to do with each other. I'd never name a child Cherry Blossom, but Sakura could be a consideration. I wouldn't name a child Spring or Fountain, but Izumi or Aviva would be perfectly acceptable... The meaning is the same. They just sound different... and their tendencies to be used as actual names are different.Plus, Apple has been used as a name, but it still doesn't feel very namelike and even if 100 people suddenly used it the same year, it would still seem weird as a name.Also, unless you're a teacher or someone in some other office READING a child's name, you are likely to HEAR the name before you ever see it on paper... thus making it less of an issue how it's spelled. Multi-cultural and ethnic names are becoming more and more of a reality... thus, expanding the pool of choices from which names are taken in the west... and not all of them will make the current top 1000 even if there are more of a particular name than there may have been of some names on the list 100 yrs. ago. Thus, it's not the best measuring tool. I'd think even among the population of Japanese and mixed couples having babies outside of Japan, the likelihood of a couple naming their baby Kaede would prob'ly be higher in Canada than in the States for obvious reasons (ie. meaning of the name and its relation to the family and context).
vote up1
Z's comment "I wonder if Amanda's was trying to honour her Canadaian roots with the name Maple." was speculation. Thus "I wonder." That might have not been the reason at all. Totally crazy thought, but maybe one of them just said "Hey what do you think of Maple as a name?" and the other one said "Yeah I like that." Glamour.com reports "No reason behind the baby's name selection, but Maple, which is very autumnal feeling, definitely fits with the list of celebrities who have given their kids names inspired by trees..."
(oh look another trend that Maple fits)Idk. I'm done with this conversation. Honestly I think if two American celebrities with no Japanese connection (because that is what I've been talking about this whole time) went and named their baby Kaede, it would show up on the "Strangest baby names of the year" list on Nameberry or something. Even if naming is becoming more multicultural.
vote up1
I live in a huge city and I'd say most people here wouldn't know how to pronounce it. I know I wouldn't at first and I actually grew up reading manga. I mean sure people who know her will get used to it, but she'll have to explain it over and over for strangers.
vote up1
Still... I think it would be easier to explain a "foreign" name than a name that seemed like a random word name.
Also, what country is this huge city in? It would vary from place to place how widely diverse the population is... I'm thinking in terms of places like Vancouver, Seattle, LA, etc. along the Pacific Rim with significant East Asian populations.
vote up1
"I think it would be easier to explain a "foreign" name than a name that seemed like a random word name."I disagree completely. Random word names have a long and vibrant history in English naming culture. Non-European names don't.
vote up1
In the Greater Vancouver area, while you might encounter the odd random word name, THESE DAYS, you're more likely to encounter an Asian name because the population has a high percentage of people of Asian origins and even among those not of Asian descent, there are a number of people who've at least lived in Asia or grown up with friends of Asian descent. There was a man on the radio one day saying that when he was a kid, there were a HUNDRED or so languages represented by the kids in the elementary school he'd gone to... and I can pretty much guarantee you that in that part of the country, some of those would be Asian. My blond haired, blue-eyed cousin stuck out like a sore thumb in public school in her area because a large percentage of her classmates were East Indian. Punjabi names are seen as "normal" in BC because they're actually quite common... and that's only one of many languages influencing naming there. Random word names, depending on what they are, would be more likely to make people think your parents were hippies... which you'd be more likely to find on the islands or in the Kootenays. Thus, "foreign name" would be super-easy to explain in the Greater Vancouver area. Random word names would have a greater chance of having people say "The parents named their kid WHAT?!" ... depending on what the word names were of course... 20 years ago, even Journey and Destiny were fringe and now they seem a bit more normal... though I'm not sure how common around Van. I met a white woman in the Van area who had named her daughter Midori even though their fam wasn't Jpns. Didn't phase me much.
Europe on the other hand may be different (and even the East Coast and Mid-West may be different) though because of lower populations of East Asians.
vote up1
I've lived in hugely ethnically diverse areas most of my life too, but I would still look askance at an Asian, Arabic or African name on a white British baby. I would see, for example, Khadija or Tabassum as really weird on a white British girl, but while Maple would also be odd, I'd recognise it as part of an established naming tradition. Names from outside the existing naming tradition are more jarring than rare ones from within it.

This message was edited 2/18/2012, 11:04 AM

vote up1
Maybe people are just more stuck on ethnically dividing names where you're from than they are in my circles... People make their choices... I went to school with a Katija when I was in Ont. as a little kid and I have no idea if she had any Arabic roots whatsoever. That was just her name... I was prob'ly an adult or close to it before I knew it even had those roots. When kids grow up with someone with a certain name, they're often more accepting of it than if they don't hear it until they're older. I know people with a blond-haired blue-eyed Aiko. She was born in Japan to American parents and now lives in Canada. I haven't heard of her having any problems with it... and she's not even at the west coast. She's in mid-elementary school now. My friend Sundeia is white and from NZ and she has to tell people how to say or spell her name a fair bit, but once they get it, it's no problem even though her name is Sanskrit... and I know 2 white gals named Chandra as well that I went to school with in Canada. You can segregate names by ethnicity if you so choose, but I'm not about to... esp. when a meaning I want works better namewise in another language.

This message was edited 2/18/2012, 4:54 PM

vote up1
my two cents:If someone is named it, it's a real name.If you want to say that something isn't traditionally used as a given name, I can agree on that.

This message was edited 2/16/2012, 11:36 PM

vote up1
Fine... But to me, it would still be in the category of naming a child Lasagne or Filet-O-Fish. It COULD be done and may be a real name for THAT CHILD, but...
vote up1