View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: What is wrong with nicknames?
in reply to a message by Ozma
I agree with you. I don't see anything wrong with nicknames. I come from a nicknamey family. My mom didn't have one (hard to come up with one for Zoe, nor is it at all necessary), but my dad was called by a nickname totally unrelated to his actual name. His given name was Joseph but he was called Bud.My brother had a nickname, but it was longer than his actual name. His name was John but we called him Johnny. My sister Linda didn't have one, and I've never had one. (You *can* get Jan from Janice, but don't dare call me Jan! Nobody ever has.) My younger sisters both have one, Pamela is always called Pam and Patricia is always called Patty.I planned on nicknames for both of my children. I used Victoria but always planned to call her Torrie, because I personally feel that Victoria is too much of a mouthful to say all of the time. William is always called Will. In his case, I chose Will because I don't like Billy or Bill, so to prevent people from assuming that was his nickname, I chose another.There are some names that I like, but they have nicknames that I don't like, certainly. Like I mentioned below, I love Veronica but hate Ronnie. In that case, I would forgo the name altogether.But I think that some names, such as Elizabeth, Victoria, Alexander, Patricia, are just cumbersome to say all of the time, and practically scream for nicknames, and I don't see anything wrong with that, provided the parents like the nickname. If they don't, best to avoid the name.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

No replies