View Message

Cute!? Twin girls in today's London "Daily Telegraph"
Harmony Sophie & Melody Elisabeth (parents, Jacqueline & Julian; siblings Joshua, Judith, Raphael & Michael).I love Melody and the concept is sweet, but I'm not sure that Harmony Sophie flows as well as her sister's combo.

This message was edited 5/17/2010, 9:12 AM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Bleh! Terminally cutesy-poo. -
vote up1
Not cute; just plain yuck.The parents' J theme works best; it's nice to see a Judith again. I don't appreciate the archangels either, but they're better than the music lesson.
vote up1
I saw that and I don't like it. They are far too matchy. The notice welcomes them to 'join our musical family.'
A mean part of me hopes that they are tone deaf. ;P
vote up1
I like Harmony and Melody but I'm not sure as a sibset let alone twins, too matchy. Your right though Harmony Sophie doesn't flow like Melody Elizabeth.I also love Jacqueline, Joshua, and Michael. Julian is okay. Judith and Raphael aren't my style.
vote up1
In theory, I like it but Harmony and Melody are rather precious, aren't they? Also, they don't seem to belong in the same family with Joshua, Judith, Raphael and Michael!I'm with you in that I like Melody too. Still, I'd rather go with the similar Melanie because the ditzy, cutesy perception is there with Melody.
vote up1
Harmony & Melody?The names themselves are nice, but together they are too saccharine-sweet "oh look at the two little princesses" for me. Like these are kittens, not people. And I agree, Harmony Sophie is too sing-songy. Harmony Sophia would have been nicer.
vote up1