Replies
I like Christopher, Michael and Laura very much indeed. The other three count as lost opportunities, as does brother Ryan.
This sounds like a sibset form the early 90's/late 80's. I really dont care for any of them.
I only like Ryan. The set is too common/trendy for my taste.
Oh, they were on A Baby Story, right?
They were born at the end of 2008. But the set is SO dated sounding to me. The whole thing.
Nichol is sort of ok, simply because I know the mom's maiden name was Nichols. Michael is also honoring (and again, I wonder, why do people name their second son after the father? Is Ryan's middle name after anyone?)
(The family's blog is here, btw! http://virgilioclan.blogspot.com/)
They were born at the end of 2008. But the set is SO dated sounding to me. The whole thing.
Nichol is sort of ok, simply because I know the mom's maiden name was Nichols. Michael is also honoring (and again, I wonder, why do people name their second son after the father? Is Ryan's middle name after anyone?)
(The family's blog is here, btw! http://virgilioclan.blogspot.com/)
Yes that's the show I was watching. ;)
I wondered that too, about honoring the second son? My husband's younger brother has his fathers name as his middle. I'm Jewish so we only name after the deceased so I don't understand how some of the honoring works.
As for the sibset, it's boring. The only thing that's distinguishing about them is the fact that they're triplets. Their names don't do anything.
As for the sibset, it's boring. The only thing that's distinguishing about them is the fact that they're triplets. Their names don't do anything.
Michael, is the best of the bunch!