Re: Surprisingly, for such a middle-of-nowhere state, Montana has good taste.
in reply to a message by Anthroponomastics
Yes, because two random BA posts encapsulate the tastes of entire states. And of course "middle of nowhere" must equate with completely tasteless. Though I'm not sure how Montana gets designated "nowhere."
This message was edited 10/14/2009, 7:57 PM
Replies
As a Montanan...
it's hardly unusual to hear someone poke fun at my beautiful home state. Chill out, Fer. Montana gets designated "nowhere" because we have fewer people than Rhode Island and one of the sparsest population densities in the nation. It's all in good fun.
it's hardly unusual to hear someone poke fun at my beautiful home state. Chill out, Fer. Montana gets designated "nowhere" because we have fewer people than Rhode Island and one of the sparsest population densities in the nation. It's all in good fun.
Attn: Fer and BrilliantBlue...
I didn't mean that about Montana in offense. Middle of nowhere means sparsely populated and extremely rural in my book. One must remember live in a rather densely popular suburb, close to a metropolis, and we have that view where I live. It's never in offense, it's just how we view more rural areas.
And thank you BrilliantBlue, for telling Fer to chill out. Nobody has ever stood up for me on this site before, and you are the only person to have ever stood up for me in my entire life. I really appreciate that.
I didn't mean that about Montana in offense. Middle of nowhere means sparsely populated and extremely rural in my book. One must remember live in a rather densely popular suburb, close to a metropolis, and we have that view where I live. It's never in offense, it's just how we view more rural areas.
And thank you BrilliantBlue, for telling Fer to chill out. Nobody has ever stood up for me on this site before, and you are the only person to have ever stood up for me in my entire life. I really appreciate that.