New Post
Search
HelpIt beats Phyllis, Adelaide, Bertha and company (m)
in reply to a message by Lily8
I find those examples excessively doddery and crypt-keeperish (although it's a general dislike of some of the sounds too)
I have a fascination with Beulah but I'm not altogether fond of the sound either. It isn't a name I would ever entertain. The name is unheard of here so there are no strong or even mild associations.
I have a fascination with Beulah but I'm not altogether fond of the sound either. It isn't a name I would ever entertain. The name is unheard of here so there are no strong or even mild associations.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Id actually take Phyllis and Adelaide anyday over Beulah
1
same here, they're much more useable
1
Me too. I like both of those names.
z
z
1
So would I. Adelaide is actually becoming quite chic again.
1
There are lots of "chic" ugly names I'd rather avoid :)
I think I'd walk off a cliff before using Adelaide but differing opinions make the board go around and it's nice to be the odd one out sometimes. That said, I couldn't really take Beulah either. Fascination is not the same as appreciation.
I think I'd walk off a cliff before using Adelaide but differing opinions make the board go around and it's nice to be the odd one out sometimes. That said, I couldn't really take Beulah either. Fascination is not the same as appreciation.
1
I personally think Adelaide is rather appealing (if not my own style).
v
v
This message was edited 5/10/2009, 11:32 PM
1
That's just peachy :)
1