Message: "Re: No... (m)" - Behind the Name

Re: No... (m)

by gaelruadh19

2/8/2009, 10:34 PM

Agreed. James is a handsome, masculine name and it does not belong on a female; Ashley, Kelly, Casey, Madison, and Leslie seem to have been claimed by girls, and would somebody please explain to me why gender-neutral names gradually become female-only territory?

Messages

James...for a girl (sort of) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:20 PM

•Please no-! · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:32 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · sonny20 · 2/8/2009, 5:29 PM

•No . . . (really) · Bear · 2/8/2009, 3:22 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Lily8 · 2/8/2009, 4:30 AM

•No... (m) · Nikki · 2/8/2009, 4:05 AM

•Re: No... (m) · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:34 PM

•Re: No... (m) · RegalAmethyst · 2/9/2009, 6:55 AM

•Oh No! Only Jamesetta or Jamesina. nt · I_Love_Jesus · 2/7/2009, 9:39 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · gigibee · 2/7/2009, 8:43 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Flute · 2/7/2009, 6:34 PM

•If at all, use it as a middle name only. · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:35 PM

•Yes [m] · Sabrina Fair · 2/7/2009, 5:59 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · RegalAmethyst · 2/7/2009, 5:29 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:49 PM

•Re: Jamesina is wonderful · Bear · 2/8/2009, 4:38 PM

•Re: Jamesina is wonderful · gaelruadh19 · 2/8/2009, 10:38 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · RegalAmethyst · 2/7/2009, 5:54 PM

•True enough! nt · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:56 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · Laurenzia · 2/7/2009, 5:28 PM

•Ivy Jamesina is lovely!! · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 6:00 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:22 PM

•Re: James...for a girl (sort of) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:28 PM

•Thanks! (m) · New_Chloe · 2/7/2009, 5:23 PM

•Re: Thanks! (m) · AnnaMichelle · 2/7/2009, 5:24 PM

View Message

Messages