New Post
Search
HelpThat's the number one pair of names for twin boys
in reply to a message by I_Love_Jesus
http://ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/twins.html
There were 69 sets of twins in 2007 names Jacob and Joshua.
Followed by Matthew, Michael with 55 sets.
So both are highly unoriginal. I like Jacob though.
There were 69 sets of twins in 2007 names Jacob and Joshua.
Followed by Matthew, Michael with 55 sets.
So both are highly unoriginal. I like Jacob though.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
I know a Michael and Matthew set.
They're in their mid-twenties now, though.
They're in their mid-twenties now, though.
1
I was going to say the same thing!
Jacob and Joshua and Matthew and Michael are so overdone and boring as twins. The way I see it, when given the special opportunity, why not do something spectacular? On the other hand, J&J and M&M are all classic bible names, so they are always nice, albeit very snoozeworthy. (If I were to use biblical names, I'd choose Ezra James and Boaz Jacob(or Noah and Jonah, Samuel and Peter, or Simon and Benjamin)
Jacob and Joshua and Matthew and Michael are so overdone and boring as twins. The way I see it, when given the special opportunity, why not do something spectacular? On the other hand, J&J and M&M are all classic bible names, so they are always nice, albeit very snoozeworthy. (If I were to use biblical names, I'd choose Ezra James and Boaz Jacob(or Noah and Jonah, Samuel and Peter, or Simon and Benjamin)
This message was edited 1/30/2009, 7:33 AM
1