View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

I dunno
I have been thinking about this and realizing that any argument I have on this subject is disturbingly groundless.David: beloved
Albert: noble and bright
Peter: stoneNothing inherently feminine or masculine about them except for common use. What about these names on girls?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

It would bother me to see those names on girls too. But at least you have the legitimate argument of a gender-neutral meaning. There's nothing gender-neutral about a name meaning son of someone though. So those names in particular bother me to see on girls.
vote up1