twins' names
Gracie and Rosie. Those are their given names(I think that may be becoming more popualar?) I thought they were really sweet and went prefectly together. Occasionally their family will just call them Grace or Rose as nn. WDYTO them?
Replies
Very sweet, I like the set a lot.
To me Gracie can be a name on its own but Rosie I think needs a foundation to it.
Too rhymey and plain for my taste.
I like the names separately, but not together. They sound waaay too matchy. And I like them as nicknames for Grace and Rose as well (even though I liek them better than the names themselves).
This message was edited 8/20/2008, 7:53 AM
Gracie and Rosie are waaay to cutesy for adults. Grace and Rose would have been more acceptable.
Like the combo and the names. There's nothing wrong with using (good) nns as fns.
BACKWARDS.
That is what I think :( Why not Grace and Rose with semipermanent nicknames Gracie and Rosie. That makes so much more sense. I looove Grace and Rose.
That is what I think :( Why not Grace and Rose with semipermanent nicknames Gracie and Rosie. That makes so much more sense. I looove Grace and Rose.
I totally agree
Nicknames as given names is a massive pet peeve of mine.
Nicknames as given names is a massive pet peeve of mine.
Ditto...
COMPLETELY backwards. I love the nicknames, but that goes against all tradition and sense, formally naming them the pet names.
COMPLETELY backwards. I love the nicknames, but that goes against all tradition and sense, formally naming them the pet names.
Tritto. Backwards.
A guy I know at work just had twins. Max and Charlie
Is the Charlie the nickname? no
Charlie and Max. Not acceptable to me!
A guy I know at work just had twins. Max and Charlie
Is the Charlie the nickname? no
Charlie and Max. Not acceptable to me!