View Message

Cruel?
Do you think it'd be cruel to name a kid.. well... any of the following?Ruby Tuesday - (after the song NOT the restaurant, I live in the UK so that part isn't really an issue)Clark KentLois LaneRobin TunneyAlbus SeverusSirius (mn)Draco ChristianConstantine (mn)River PhoenixChandler (mn)Richey JamesPonyboySodapopAnakin (mn)Marlon (mn)Silvester (mn)Amadeus (as a mn)Cash (prolly just as a mn)Gerard (mn)Chad (mn)Buddy HollyJoviMost of these are cause I like the names, not necessarily a fan of all of them.... are there any that would actually be ok? And, where I can't think of one, do any middle names come to mind?
Also, can you think of any other good ones?
thanks
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I LOVE Sirius!
Silvester and Gerard are also fine.The only terrible ones are Sodapop and Ponyboy - they're ridiculous
vote up1
I find these acceptableRuby Tuesday
Clark Kent
Lois Lane
Sirius (mn)
Draco Christian
Constantine (mn)
River Phoenix
Chandler (mn)
Anakin (mn)
Marlon (mn)
Silvester (mn)
Amadeus (as a mn)
Cash (prolly just as a mn)
Gerard (mn)
Chad (mn)
JoviSodapop I adore but not for a real child
vote up1
I wrote a rant in response to Albus Severus that I think addresses all the fan names, so I'll just put it at the beginning...Albus Severus - YES. On two levels: one, it was cruel for Harry to name his child this, and he had an excuse. This is an awful name which would envoke teasing irrelvant of the books. Second, and more importantly, the amount of fanboyishness is too, too much. The child would be forever tied to Harry Potter. This is my personal rule with fan/honouring names: it doesn't matter what person is being referenced, whether it's high brow or not. (I fell for Margery because of a comedy sketch and love Martha and Abigail because of a very silly musical about the signing of the declaration, I'm not proud.) What matters is whether every person who meets the kid will think of that one person/book, etc, irrelevant of whether this association is positive, negative or neutral. Adolf is not okay, but neither is Lincoln. A child is not a banner to advertise their parents' interests- by this I don't mean one should never reference those interests or heros, but only that the child shouldn't be tied to them. If I decided to honour heros and named my kids, say, Katherine, Linnet, Gwendolen, Cora and Thomas (only a few of my many reference names), they wouldn't have that problem. If I named them Shakespeare, Sweeney, Wilde, Sondheim and Rosencrantz, they would. (They would also all have last names...) Am I making sense, or am I rambling and likely starting an argument? I hope I don't offend anyone who likes hero names because I like and have many hero names...just, not ones like Albus Severus likely to make a kid miserable.My thoughts on the others:Sirius (mn) - Fine as a middle name.Draco Christian - A little too overdramatic, a little too tied to HP. Christian Draco would be okay in the HP respect, but still overdramatic.Constantine (mn) - Fine as a middle name.Chandler (mn) - Plenty of people seem fine with it as a first name. I think it could stand a short sharp shock from a cheap and chippy chopper on a big black block, but I wouldn't call it cruel, just an unweildy and annoying surname.Richey JamesPonyboy - Yes. In a word, yes.Sodapop - Yes.Amadeus (as a mn) - I like it as a MN.Cash (prolly just as a mn) - Yeah. Don't name your child after money.Gerard (mn) - I don't like it particularly, but I'm confused about what would make it cruel.
vote up1
I think these would be unusable/silly/plain horrible:Clark Kent
Robin Tunney (Robin's nice, though)
Albus Severus (ick)
Draco Christian (I do think Draco would be OK as a mn, though)
Ponyboy
Sodapop
Anakin
Buddy Holly
vote up1
Ruby Tuesday- I personally wouldn't use this, but it's not totally cruel.Clark Kent- Kenneth Clark would be okay, but Clark Kent sound ugly, not to mention very Superman.Lois Lane- basically same as aboveRobin Tunney- don't know who this is. I like Robin, Tunney not so much.Albus Severus- I'm sorry, but this is just rather stupidSirius (mn)- fine as a mnDraco Christian- ironic is what comes to find.Constantine (mn)- perfectly acceptableRiver Phoenix- tactlessChandler (mn)- Love this name!Richey James- dislike both namesPonyboy- unless your Native American it would be akward.Sodapop- incredibly cruel!Anakin (mn)- fine as a mnMarlon (mn)- nothing wrong with this name.Silvester (mn)- not a fan, but okay as a mn.Amadeus (as a mn)- fineCash (prolly just as a mn)- okay as a mn onlyGerard (mn)- dislike it, but it's usableChad (mn)- saaBuddy Holly- Buddy is okay as a nn for a boy and Holly is fine on a girl, but together it's just weird.Jovi- okay as a nn or maybe a mn.
vote up1
Ponyboy and Sodapop would be cruel.
vote up1
Ditto, people won't care if they're from a book.
vote up1
Do you think it'd be cruel to name a kid.. well... any of the following?Ruby Tuesday no. Personally I'm not familiar neither with the song nor the restaurantClark Kent not "cruel" maybe but silly. The kind of name a comic-obsessed teen would pickLois Lane see aboveRobin Tunney not familiar with the reference. Tunney is uglyAlbus Severus see Clark KentSirius (mn) possibly ok as a middle nameDraco Christian Draco is off-limits until the Harry Potter craze dies out. with Christian it's a bit oddConstantine (mn) perfectly fine. Don't see what bugs you about it, is it the -ine ending that may look feminine?River Phoenix why would you want to name a child after someone so ill-fated?Chandler (mn) ok as a middle nameRichey James don't get the reference, but Richey won't age well at allPonyboy this name is not fit for a human being. Yes, I'd say it's cruel. Imagine someone going to a job interview, and introducing himself as Ponyboy SmithSodapop see PonyboyAnakin (mn) bearable as a middle name, albeit nerdyMarlon (mn) fine as middle nameSilvester (mn)ditto (ok also as fn)Amadeus (as a mn) tritto (ok also as fn, possibly)Cash (prolly just as a mn) ok as a middle name, though it reminds me of cash as in moneyGerard (mn) perfectly fine name. Don't see why it could be considered cruelChad (mn) see aboveBuddy Holly don't get the reference, but looks sillyJovi looks nicknamey and the sort of name a teeny-bopper would pick
vote up1
Ruby Tuesday - just really dislike both "names"Chandler - I see no major problems with this, especially as a mn, any of the mns would be fine because they are in the mn positionPonyboy, Sodapop - I love The Outsiders, but always thought the names were kind of stupid, no offenceCash - really not a fan of word names, or surnames as first/middle names, unless its a family name (and only in the mn position)Chad - I went to school with more than a handful of boys named Chad. This is completely acceptable in my book
vote up1
Ruby Tuesday - noClark Kent - not cruelLois Lane - noRobin Tunney - noAlbus Severus - no, but I'd think it was kinda lame.Sirius (mn) - not cruel but kinda lameDraco Christian - noConstantine (mn) - noRiver Phoenix - noChandler (mn) - noRichey James - moPonyboy - Yes. This is cruel. Well, I don't phrase it that way myself, but I will put it in the "cruel" box since you asked.Sodapop - not quite cruel, but I think it sure is annoying and kinda dumb; I'd change it if I were named that.Anakin (mn) - not cruelMarlon (mn) - noSilvester (mn) - noAmadeus (as a mn) - noCash (prolly just as a mn) - noGerard (mn) - noChad (mn) - no. I know people named this, and I don't see how many of these names could possibly be seen as cruelBuddy Holly - noJovi - not cruel, but lame.
vote up1
I love Constantine and Amadeus! I think they would be great for fn or mn.
vote up1
Ruby Tuesday - don't know of the restaurant but I like the song *hums the song* No I don't think it would be cruel if you do it because you like the song.Clark Kent - kind of cruel, mainly beacause it's an unattractive nameLois Lane - can't stand the name so yes, cruelRobin Tunney - I don't know about this person so I can't answer. Who is s/he?Albus Severus - yesSirius (mn) - no, I like the name. Don't think it's too Harry Potter-ish like Albus Severus Draco Christian - hate Draco, love Christian. Can't see the cruel part thoughConstantine (mn)- not at all cruel, nice nameRiver Phoenix - yes, cruel and I don't know stupid and...weird. I think you should choose to either use River or PhoenixChandler (mn)- cruel because I really dislike the nameRichey James - don't know of this personPonyboy - LOL Yes, cruel, cruel, cruelSodapop - see aboveAnakin (mn)- no, not cruel. At least it's not Chewbacca ;)Marlon (mn)- Cruel? NO! I really like this name. I like the sound and look of it and Marlon Brando was a great actor.Silvester (mn)- not cruelAmadeus (as a mn) - no, it's such a sweet name. I think it would be a lovely middle nameCash (prolly just as a mn)- ok as a middle nameGerard (mn)- dislike but not cruelChad (mn)- gah! Ugly sounding name! Not cruel just bad taste ;)Buddy Holly - A bit cruelJovi - If you're a Bon Jovi fan it's ok but if you're not don't use it. People will assume that the poor kid is named after him because his parents loved Bon Jovi not just because they liked the name.
vote up1
I would agree with Catarina, it wouldn't be cruel, just tasteless.The ones I think are usable:Ruby - I don't care much for it, but it's still a decent name
Sirius - MN only
Marlon
Cash - MN only
Gerard
Chad
vote up1
I don't think it'd be necessarily cruel, but it'd be pretty tasteless.
vote up1
fair enough.... they're not all on my list.... and not all the names on my list are famous ones like that. I just like some of them
vote up1
I mean, Ruby and Christian for instance are perfectly nice names... but Ruby Tuesday and Draco Christian, besides their character associations, are ugly combos to me. Sorry. :P
vote up1
No need to apologise! They aren't set in stone... well Draco Christian isn't and I DID ask for opinions, good and bad
vote up1