View Message

Sibsets (distant cousins of mine)
I feel a little strange... posting names I found in a Christmas card. Oh, well. These are the names:Hazen (5)
Anika (3)
Skyye (2)Steiner (3)
Taylor Lynn (3 months)WDYT?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Well man.
Anika's okay, I don't really see why everyone on BtN loves it so much. But Hazen is bad and Sky is already contrived, but Skyye is completely ridiculous, and I have no idea of Hazen or Skyye's genders.Steiner is actually neat as far as surname-names go. I don't see it a lot, and it has a distinctive, solid sound to it. (I also have a rather mary-suelike character whom I adore called Tom Steiner, so it has a soft spot for me.) Taylor Lynn is disappointing. I assume it's a girl, which is depressing.
vote up1
Wow, Anika lucked out big-time! It's not a favorite at all but it's waaaaaaay better than the crap that is Hazen and Skyye.Steiner and Taylor Lynn are bad as well. Steiner? The heck?
vote up1
Anika seems cute and exotic even though I know it is just a pet form of Anna. I like it.

This message was edited 12/15/2007, 3:18 PM

vote up1
Love Anika, and would've liked Skye.
vote up1
Hazen (5) - Prefer (what a surprise!) Hazel
Anika (3) - Wonderful! I dislike Annika, but Anika is really pretty.
Skyye (2) - Why? Why couldn't the parents stick on Skye?Steiner (3) - To honour Steiner Scools?
Taylor Lynn (3 months) - For some weird reason I like Taylor on girls more than on boys. The whole name is too unisex.
vote up1