Message: "Logan & Chandler"

Logan & Chandler

by Isla

1/29/2005, 9:19 PM

So at first thought did you think two boys or two girls?

I met two gorgeous blonde haired, blonde eyed sisters tonight, about 5 and 6 years old, named Logan and Chandler. Arghhhhh!

Ok, I'm not a big fan of unisex names, but these seem rather masculine for girls imo. But then again, I do have a distant cousin (a girl, about 21) named Logan so I knew it "could" be used for a girl. But I was still shocked. These sisters definitely looked more like a Katie & Emily (classic even though they're way too popular--but at least they're feminine!) or something to that effect.

Guess I'm done with my rant now....

#Chandler #Logan

Replies

- Elinor (guest) +1

1/30/2005, 7:55 AM

I really prefer both Logan and Chandler for girls *ducks under table*. Logan especially is tired on boys, and both name are more unusual on girls. I only like Chandler enough to use it though :-)

- Isla

1/30/2005, 7:40 PM

Don't be afraid to give your opinion. I know those of us unisex-name-haters can go a little over the top about our feelings sometimes (*averts eyes, shuffles feet* "Who, me?" LOL) but don't be afraid to say how you feel. Even if you're in the minority. ...Just kidding about that last part. :b

- Trudy

1/29/2005, 10:39 PM

Two boys, I hate these names on girls

- Chrisell

1/29/2005, 9:26 PM

I *definitely* thought "two boys". Ewww! I hate boys' names on girls, and that's just awful.

- hennig

1/29/2005, 9:25 PM

Boys... but I wouldn't be surprised if they were girls.

Unisex names that were just 10 years ago only boy names, seems so refreshing on boys now.

- edk (guest)

1/29/2005, 9:25 PM

lol yeah i know what you mean. I saw a set of twin girls, same description. i so expected them to be like Emma and Ava or something, but they were Karsyn and Addyson. Yucko I hate unisex names.

View Message

Replies