Elijah
Replies
Not keen
Male name only, sorry!!
I don't like it at all
No! I'm sorry, but Elijah's a male name to me. It was a male name in the Bible, and has been used exclusively for boys for hundreds of years. Even if it's used for girls in your area, I believe most of the world still considers it 100% male. I liken it to Joshua or even John on a girl, really--it just doesn't wash with me.
Just because a male name ends in -a or -ah doesn't make it feminine. See Joshua, again, or many of the Russian diminutives for male names (Vanya, Dima, Pasha, etc), or African male names like Kobina.
I agree with Shantastic, in that I agree that it's particularly pointless to use Elijah for a girl when you have the oh-so-similar sounding Eliza. (Kind of like using Aubrey instead of Audrey on a girl, really.) I also agree with Carrie about encouraging this male names on girls trend.
Elijah Laurel does sound nice though.
Miranda
No! I'm sorry, but Elijah's a male name to me. It was a male name in the Bible, and has been used exclusively for boys for hundreds of years. Even if it's used for girls in your area, I believe most of the world still considers it 100% male. I liken it to Joshua or even John on a girl, really--it just doesn't wash with me.
Just because a male name ends in -a or -ah doesn't make it feminine. See Joshua, again, or many of the Russian diminutives for male names (Vanya, Dima, Pasha, etc), or African male names like Kobina.
I agree with Shantastic, in that I agree that it's particularly pointless to use Elijah for a girl when you have the oh-so-similar sounding Eliza. (Kind of like using Aubrey instead of Audrey on a girl, really.) I also agree with Carrie about encouraging this male names on girls trend.
Elijah Laurel does sound nice though.
Miranda
It is cute although, because it is a boys name where I live and most commonly a boys names its hard to picture. but it is nice,
I only like it as a boy name.
I love the name Elijah, but for me it belongs only on a boy. The way I see it, there are soooo many great girls' names out there and not so many great boys' names, so the few great boys' names that exist should not be used for girls. If this trend continues, we could end up with no more actual male names--just girls' names and unisex names. Of course, one female Elijah will not mean the end of the world, but I simply can't encourage it. My advice to anyone who loves the name Elijah is to save it for a son. (And as someone else mentioned, many people will associate this name with Elijah Wood, and this is a wonderful association imo!) Just my two cents. :)
I like it.
Taken in the context that it's not a boy's name in your region. I like the name on either. :)
Taken in the context that it's not a boy's name in your region. I like the name on either. :)
It's ridiculous to me on a girl, sorry.
Well...I can't picture a baby girl (& definitely not a grown woman or an old lady) named Elijah at all. Laurel has been ruined for me by a girl I once knew in high school - she was very obnoxious and gave bad attitude to everyone & the teachers! Her name was spelt Lorelle though. Sorry, I haven't given very positive feedback have I?
The cross gender thing is less annoying than usual in the case of normally male biblical names ending in -ah, as far as I am concerned. The name is so totally archaic that it's probably not unprecedented to use it on a female, and it sounds alright because of the -ah ending being mostly feminine in English; not that I think a girl named Elijah is fortunate in any way.. even if no one realizes it's a man in the Bible.
Nice combo.
- chazda
Nice combo.
- chazda
Well its nice to see Kelly R. branching out. Unfortunately (or not), I do agree that Elijah sounds better on a boy (with the nn Eli pron. EE LIE (like DIE)), but its for superficial reasons (I could care less about masculine, feminine, etc. and would never insist that someone couldn't use a name, thats just so defiant & self centred)& I think Elliott could work for a girl (with the nn Ellie) as could Eleanor, Ella, or Elle.
BTW: I should clarify that when it comes to the name Cora, for my own sanity I have to urge caution (long story, LOL) & so I'll acknowledge we all have our weaknesses.
BTW: I should clarify that when it comes to the name Cora, for my own sanity I have to urge caution (long story, LOL) & so I'll acknowledge we all have our weaknesses.
Wow, it's amazing...you can always tell exactly what a post is going to be about if Kelly R. has replied to it.
I'm kind of indifferent to Elijah on either gender, really. I thought it was a bit girly when I first heard it, and I think on the whole it goes in my 'prefer it on a boy, but sounds too girly to use on a real live boy' (hehe, like Pinnochio!) list, along with Julian, Tristan, etc.
So, to summarise my rambling, I think it could work on a girl, I think people still might expect it to be used on a boy regardless of popularity because most people know who Elijah Wood is, and, for some people at least, is the only association they have with the name. And Elijah Laurel is pretty!
I'm kind of indifferent to Elijah on either gender, really. I thought it was a bit girly when I first heard it, and I think on the whole it goes in my 'prefer it on a boy, but sounds too girly to use on a real live boy' (hehe, like Pinnochio!) list, along with Julian, Tristan, etc.
So, to summarise my rambling, I think it could work on a girl, I think people still might expect it to be used on a boy regardless of popularity because most people know who Elijah Wood is, and, for some people at least, is the only association they have with the name. And Elijah Laurel is pretty!
You're right, I tend to dread those posts cos I know I'll be getting a hard time lol. Unless it's a "girls' name" (unisex, nearly always) on a boy, in which case I'm getting massive praise hehehe. A touch unfair but I'm thickskinned! Hehehe. Thanks muchly for the feedback!
Sorry, but even though the name may be unheard of where you live, Elijah should not be used on a girl anywhere in my opinion because the name is a male biblical name. Even if biblical names aren't as "in" where you are as they are here, the name should nonentheless be used only on its intended gender, especially since it has an important reference as a male name (and none as a female name).
This message was edited 12/23/2004, 9:01 AM
Hmmm ... My own belief is that human is human, and that there is no reason a male historical character cannot be borne in mind (bear in mind = borne in mind???) when the name is bestowed on a female child. Equally, I would bear the female Shakespearean character Regan in mind if I were to give the name to my son.
I'm not arguing or anything - just hoping to explain my stance better :-)
I'm not arguing or anything - just hoping to explain my stance better :-)