Message: "New Twins!" - Behind the Name

[Opinions] New Twins!

by Nikida

9/24/2006, 8:22 PM

I forgot to post the latest twins when they arrived two months ago so here they are!

Their all old family names since the dad loves to dig around and find out all the family history.
They were also supposed to have a baby girl but they lost her earlier into the pregnancy and didn't name her.

#twins

Replies

- Athena_skye

9/25/2006, 11:59 AM

hmmm...I know about two sets of Landon and Logan twins already. Whatever floats thier boat I guess :)

- Laurie (guest)

9/25/2006, 10:06 AM

They remind me of a list of kids in a class, alphabetically, as in:
Landon, Matthew
Logan, Bryant

I still prefer surnames as surnames or middle names, but can stand them for boys moreso than for girls.

- Kris Rose

9/25/2006, 7:13 AM

Too cutesy. I love Logan, but I hate it when parents give their kids names too close, or same letter names...in this case, I find them to be too close and the both start with L. Not to mention I dont like either flow for the combos

~~Kris~~

This message was edited 9/25/2006, 7:13 AM

- menno_girl

9/24/2006, 9:15 PM

Yes to all four! That's too bad about the daughter, though.

- Lisa007

9/24/2006, 9:01 PM

I like both names but not the fact that there is an "L" theme.

View Message

Replies