View Message

Leighton: Either an old rich guy or a rich kid named after an old rich guy.

---

Lexington: "I wanted to call my kid Lexi but I thought Alex- names were boring so I named her after Lexington, KY"

---

Livingston: This is just a city to me, I can't picture it on a person even in the way I pictured Lexington.

---

I see Leighton and Livingston on boys and Lexington on a girl.

---

Leighton Conrad, Lexington Ashley, and Livingston... idk, it still doesn't sound like a name at all to me

This message was edited 10/29/2023, 6:12 PM

Lexington and Livingston are both places near me, so I can’t see them as first names. Leighton is okay though. I have met a little girl with this name and it doesn’t seem as much of a surname as the others. I would think Leighton with this spelling would be a girl because of the Leigh part, but I could see Layton on a boy being pronounced the same. Livingston would definitely be a boy. I’m not sure on Lexington. Maybe unisex.

I don’t care for any of them as a first name but if I had to pick I’d go with Lexington. A girl could be called Lexi and you can shorten it to Tony for a boy. Actually a boy named any of these could be called Tony.

Unless they are family names, which is unlikely, I dislike and deplore all of them. I would not pick one, regardless of gender.

Leighton

Leighton is probably the most name-y in sound, then Lexington, and Livingston not at all.
If I had to pick one it would be Lexington nn Lexi for a girl or Lex for a boy.
I’d prefer Livingston not be used as a first name at all for anyone. Leighton I’ve seen used as masculine and Lexington as feminine and I don’t mind I guess.
No combinations come to mind at the moment.