Message: "Re: Hazel on a Boy"

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Hazel on a Boy

by Somebody random (guest)

8/3/2020, 7:38 AM

Nope. Hazel is purely feminine. It might suit a boy if he had the right personality for it, but it just works better on a girl.

Replies

- Somebody random (guest) +3

8/3/2020, 8:20 AM

Allen and Kieran are masculine. Allen especially sounds dumb on a girl - what’s wrong with Alana? Alanis? Alani? Even Allena would have been better.

- Dracotorix +2

8/3/2020, 4:41 PM

I'm wondering if they were thinking of Ellen and Allie and somehow completely forgot that Alan / Allan / Allen existed?

- Somebody random (guest) +1

8/3/2020, 5:44 PM

Who knows? Either way, this masculine-to-feminine name trend needs to die.

- Katrine

8/4/2020, 2:11 AM

I agree! I think it’s awful

- Somebody random (guest) +4

8/3/2020, 7:55 AM

Hazael

I kinda like Hazael, actually - though I don’t really know why. It would be a much better choice of a boy than Hazel, though.

- RoxStar +3

8/3/2020, 8:06 AM

I disagree; it would be like saying Rachael would make a better male name than Rachel.

- Cake or Death (queenv)

8/3/2020, 8:43 AM

Apparently, they're not pronounced the same. We all know how Hazel is pronounced, but it appears that Hazael is HAZ-ay-el. Like, stick a long I in the middle.

- Somebody random (guest) +1

8/3/2020, 8:09 AM

Hazael is a purely male name while Hazel is not, though. What’s your point?

- Dracotorix

8/3/2020, 4:30 PM

Agree, but also I do think Rachael is more masculine than Rachel lol.
Hazael reminds me of names like Raphael and Azazel.

View Message

Replies