View Message

[Opinions] sort of BA
My cousin's wife's sister recently gave birth to a boy called Hudson. He joins older brother Heath, who is 4.I'm not crazy about the sibset, but Heath is so adorable that it's grown on me. I haven't met Hudson yet, so currently it still seems... eh. Not like a name.My cousin's daughter is 2, and her name is Amber Lucy.
So Heath and Hudson, wdyt?Katie
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Heath and Hudson don't bother me at all. The names are nice enough and actually work quite well for brothers imo. Amber Lucy is a really cute combo and one I suggested in the Amber post above!
vote up1
I like Hudson. I like Heath. I actually prefer Hudson to Heath. Hudson is the name of my favourite Gargoyle. ;)I don't like them as a sibset, because I don't like matchy first initials. :/
vote up1
I like Hudson. I've never liked the sound of Heath much, but it's okay. I do like the style of the names together, but the alliteration makes them a little much.Amber Lucy is cute. Amber is too common for my taste, but it's not a bad name IMO.
vote up1
I like Hudson but not so much Heath (Just never cared for it)And I'm not crazy for the broset of Hudson & Heath. I think another name would have went far better with "Heath"
Heath seems more vintage, classic & uncommon whereas Hudson seems more modern and trendy
vote up1
Heath and Hudson would have been my ideal sibset when I was 13! Those were two of my favorite names 10 years ago. I thought Hudson was *soo* New York chic, and I was in love with Heath Ledger. :)I don't hate them these days, but they are much further down on Names I Would Use.Reminds me of another H sibset I know of, Hazel and Harvey, which I adore.

This message was edited 8/6/2015, 8:41 AM

vote up1
Hudson is one of the ugliest names ever, IMHO. Heath is not my thing at all, but it's not as bad as Hudson.I actually really like Amber Lucy. Amber is growing on me.
vote up1