[Opinions] Re: How are Katherine and Elizabeth boring? nt.
in reply to a message by Catherine N.
I don't think it's a question of standing the test of time. When I hear names like Elizabeth and Katherine, I also think "boring", but that doesn't mean they aren't classics, and it doesn't mean I don't like them. They're just ubiquitous; if I hear a name like Ashley or Megan, I can picture something more specific, like a woman of a certain age, because they are dated. Elizabeth and Katherine are blank slates because they've been around so long and have been used so much. I think that's what Mirfak was talking about, though I can't speak for her, of course.
Willoughby wolloughby willina, an elephant sat on Billina.
Willoughby wolloughby wirfak, an elephant sat on Mirfak.
Willoughby wolloughby willina, an elephant sat on Billina.
Willoughby wolloughby wirfak, an elephant sat on Mirfak.
This message was edited 5/23/2015, 3:20 PM
Replies
We'll have to agree to disagree about this issue. I respect each of your opnions, but I will say that, in my opinion, a "blank slate" would be prferred over a dated, trendy name.