View Message

[Facts] feminine form of Luke - Family Tree
Is there a reason why Luke doesn't have any feminine variants (according to the BtN database?). Are there any that are just not listed?
vote up1vote down

Replies

Whitepages (http://names.whitepages.com/) lists these names in the US which may be based on Luke:
Luketha, Luketa, Luketia, Lukethia, Luket, Lukette, Lukeith, Lukeitha, Lukeithia, Lukeitta, Luketta, Lukiana, Lukianna, Lukienna. They're all very rare.
I also found a Lukina and 4 Lukias in the England and Wales birth, marriage & death records, who all have Greek surnames. No idea if Lukia is Luke-based or a variant of Lucia.
vote up1vote down
I don't have one in my own database either.I think most of the time you don't get any "reasons" for something like that with given names. It so happens over the course of history that somebody coines a female form for Luke, the name becomes popular and stays - or it doesn't happen, just as well. Nobody will be able to tell why or why not.A candidate for a female form would be Lucasa, from the Latin form Lucas, or Loukasa, from the Old Greek Form Loukas. It's interesting that Search on Facebook comes up with a handful of women that gave Lucasa as their name, so maybe there are female variants after all...
vote up1vote down