View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Conor
in reply to a message by Siân
Not a fan of either as it's way too surnamish for me and I've never found it very attractive, but if one must,I suppose Conor would be preferable.
It's also a tad on the trendy side right now and has overused preppy name written all over it.

This message was edited 6/17/2010, 1:22 AM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I'd never use it in real life, but it works for my character and I still have it on my long list of names that I like.
Using it irl would be too yuppie for me personally.
vote up1
Yeah... have to agree on that last bit.
vote up1
Oh, this saddens me. Sorry to but in.But Conor has been a family fn for me for generations. It is a fn, in this Conor spelling. Irish surnames often change spelling slightly when used as a surname, at least the way the English have co-opted them. Thus, Conor O'Connor, Brian O'Brien, Cormac McCormick, Lachlan McLaughlin. (OK, that last one is Scottish. But same principle.)That's why I don't care for the Connor spelling -- it's too surname-y for me. But Conor is definitely a fn! Think Conor Cruise O'Brien, the Irish writer. I'm sorry to go on and on. I just hate to see a gorgeous name like Conor get passed over for inaccurate reasons.

This message was edited 6/17/2010, 9:09 AM

vote up1
It's still unattractive to me no matter how it's spelled, but you can like it if you want to. It's become a trendy preppy name these days in a similar category to Brandon, Brendan, Ethan and Liam... none of which are in any way attractive to me... Thus, regardless of its history, it still qualifies as a rather yuppie name in our current society... at least in N. Am. anyway. May be different in GB and Ireland, but where I am, it really falls into that trendy preppy name category for this generation. Next generation, something else will fit that category.

This message was edited 6/17/2010, 4:25 PM

vote up1