View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] I think you missed her point? (maybe) nt
x

This message was edited 6/1/2009, 8:33 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I'm pretty certain she was suggesting that my point was somehting to do with the gay connotation. That isn't at all what I was meaning. San Francisco was named after a person: Francisco was a legitimate name before the city ever existed. Brighton on the other hand, doesn't have the same history and seems like another trendy placename. Therefore the association isn't with the name, it is with the place.I'm in Scotland where naming your child Francisco would be perfectly normal. Naming your child Brighton would be decidedly odd. I suppose that is different in the US as Brighton isn't so well-known there but it would still be an association for a lot of people. Francisco doesn't have as strong connotations with San Francisco as a gay capital. In fact, the first San Francisco I think of is a small village in Italy that I visited with my family once - there are hundreds of San Franciscos there. I'm only aware of one Brighton.
vote up1
ah I see, yeah it must be different [US vs. Oversea] like I said I [m]only have heard of Brighton, Colorado, and that's where I got the name from.

This message was edited 6/1/2009, 8:51 PM

vote up1
Fair enoughA lot of placenames in American/Canada/Australia have their origins in countries like Britain. For example, whenever people mention Perth it takes me a second to realise they're referring to Australia not the tiny nothing of a city in Scotland which Perth, Australia derived its name from!
vote up1
Lol I wouldn't call the Perth in Scotland a city!

This message was edited 6/2/2009, 12:12 AM

vote up1