[Opinions] Re: John?
in reply to a message by bagulec
I've always loved the name John. It may have been used too much in the past, but I rarely hear it anymore in the under twenty set. To me, both John and Mary are a breath of fresh air.
John is strong, but kind; a still waters run deep kind of a guy. I suppose that's why when I was younger I wanted to have either a husband or a ds named John.
Alan and John sound perfectly fine as siblings to me.
Pet forms of John include: Johnny, Jack, and Jenkin.
Mns I like with John:
John Christopher
John Aubrey
John Lawrence / Laurence
John Graham
John Francis
John Cormac
John Daniel
John Magnus
John Clement
John Gareth
John Sebastian
John Oliver
John Cornelius
Anything but "John Thomas." In "Lady Chatterley's Lover," John Thomas was a euphamism for a penis. It's been used that way ever since.
P.S. LMS has a point.
John is strong, but kind; a still waters run deep kind of a guy. I suppose that's why when I was younger I wanted to have either a husband or a ds named John.
Alan and John sound perfectly fine as siblings to me.
Pet forms of John include: Johnny, Jack, and Jenkin.
Mns I like with John:
John Christopher
John Aubrey
John Lawrence / Laurence
John Graham
John Francis
John Cormac
John Daniel
John Magnus
John Clement
John Gareth
John Sebastian
John Oliver
John Cornelius
Anything but "John Thomas." In "Lady Chatterley's Lover," John Thomas was a euphamism for a penis. It's been used that way ever since.
P.S. LMS has a point.
This message was edited 6/3/2007, 1:41 PM