[Opinions] Re: Larkin?
in reply to a message by LL
I don't care for it. It isn't at all masculine, it is a tad surname-y, and the word lark too strongly within it. I don't see it as a nickname for Laurence -which I don't care for, but since it's a family name, then it's OK-, as I think it's more derived from the name, rather than a short/pet form of it (my opinion only), and while you may not like Laurie as a nickname, the child might; I think nicknames should not be planned, but should be left up to the child, and I also don't think the decision of a formal name (Laurence) should revolve around a nickname (Larkin).Edit: Added a comment.

-Lissa Hannah-
As soon as tradition has come to be recognized as tradition, it is dead. - Allan Bloom

This message was edited 3/11/2005, 5:46 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Larkin?  ·  LL  ·  3/11/2005, 4:20 PM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Seda*  ·  3/14/2005, 2:29 PM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Isla  ·  3/12/2005, 11:34 PM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Elinor  ·  3/12/2005, 9:19 AM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Lisa007  ·  3/12/2005, 1:17 AM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Jessica  ·  3/11/2005, 9:58 PM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Trudy  ·  3/11/2005, 8:42 PM
Re: Larkin?  ·  chazda  ·  3/11/2005, 8:00 PM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Miss Claire  ·  3/11/2005, 5:58 PM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Lissa Hannah  ·  3/11/2005, 5:44 PM
Re: Larkin?  ·  raindancing  ·  3/11/2005, 5:32 PM
Yes, I think they were, Pa Larkin seems to ring a bell nt  ·  Poppylena  ·  3/12/2005, 1:53 AM
Re: Yes, I think they were, Pa Larkin seems to ring a bell nt  ·  Lauren B  ·  3/12/2005, 8:38 AM
Re: Larkin?  ·  Mimi  ·  3/11/2005, 4:46 PM